Browsing the archives for the environment category

Oil and water – a recipe for disaster, or evolution?

No Comments
economy, environment, evolution, health

Getting upset about things of the world don’t too often get deep under my skin, but the latest disaster that threatens to take away even more of our pristine areas just feels like a kick in the gut. I actually had to avoid reading as much as I usually do on the event, since visions of helpless animals covered in oil and honest-working families suffering potential economic tragedies just flooded my mind with negative thoughts. Instead of wallowing in the misery, I thought how this event could cause all of us to pause and think about where we are in our evolution.

We are now at the stage of our humanity where we can create really amazing technologies while reducing our imprint on this planet with outdated technologies that cannot be sustainable with the amount of people that live in the world. The mass bulk of people of the world would  want to have the American / Western civilization lifestyle. To avoid a the creation of a black hole here on earth, we can make a few changes.

I’m talking:

  • Cars with piston engines that can be powered with compressed air
  • Solar-powered technology
  • Wind power
  • Tide power (no, not the detergent)
  • Educating about pollution and litter control
  • Green chemistry for pharmaceutical production
  • … just for starters …

Yes, battery hybrid cars are a step in the right direction, but how long until we see a disaster from the battery production and disposal when all cars on the road are running on Duracells? If we are to think that we can envision wonderful vacations with pure sandy beaches, warm ocean waters to swim in, landscapes of modern cities without pollution, while at the same time having more fossil fuel cars, more plastic, and more Fritos chip bags, then we are trying to realize a pipe dream.

It all starts with a change of the mind… with imagination. John Lennon got the tune right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okd3hLlvvLw

Imagine, imagine, imagine. Each physical item began by manifesting an image, a thought.

Okay, I’ll start. Imagine a place where people are given a base salary to keep the planet free of litter and making purchasing decisions that improved the habitat. Imagine that companies started building products and trying to reach a zero habitat impact throughout the whole production of products and services. Imagine that people stop idolizing raunchy (and sometimes funny) TV shows that are setting examples for how our children are behaving (and even some grown-ups). Imagine that poverty and wars only exist in history books.

If you’re telling me that you don’t believe that any of this can happen, I would say that you need to start imagining. We are Homo Sapiens. We won the race and are now the most dominant species. Game over. Now, let’s try a new game. The rules are pretty simple. We see the destruction of the habitat as the great enemy without a face, and we start combating this enemy with green arms. Those are the same kinds of arms that hug people and pick up messes. The market is obliged to follow and furnish us with the tools and products to fulfill our desires, as soon as we make our voice clear. Center your mind on good thoughts, then let your voice speak them.

Oh, I just saw you on a white sandy beach at a reservoir with a refreshing drink of your choice in a cup that you can eat. You look great! Enjoy your day.

-Keitan

AVATAR in 3D – Nature vs. Guns

No Comments
environment, evolution, political, technology

After so many recommendations to see this movie, I decided to spend a warm and sunny winter afternoon inside a theater with my wife. We saw Avatar in 3D, complete with nerd glasses. I think my wife looked better in them than I.

Avatar is a wonderfully imaginative tale that made me wonder if the blue humanoids on the screen are real, or created in a computer lab. Add the three-dimensional effect and the blur becomes even more distinct. The topography of the world of Pandora, complete with floating mountains and luminescent creatures piqued my senses and drew emotions out of me that I hadn’t felt in a very long time. The Featurette gives a sensational glimpse of this fantastic world (link to featurette at bottom of this blog post):

Courtesy 20th Century FOX

Courtesy 20th Century FOX

The repeated references to the connection of living beings to their home world gave me hope that those in the theater would be immersed in natural spirit and somehow be brought to a new sense of awareness through multimedia osmosis. At times I allowed my senses to connect to the world of Pandora, as I have many times connected with the energy of our wonderful creation, Mother Earth, and her creator. It’s a lovely feeling when I can draw on the cycle of life between predator and prey, birth and death, all the while enjoying the fullness of life. If I could have my wish, I would like to see a version of this movie that only focused on the connection-building scenes that help one appreciate her/his animal body and to relink thought to remember that our bodily vessels are made up of earthbound substances. It seems like in this age we are bombarded with images that seem to separate us from the natural world. In this train of thought lives the irresponsible consumerism that destroys our world at such a rapid pace. It is an important message for us to give reverence to our habitat. Though we may be able to create a new and wonderful world free of mosquitos on the big screen, creating one in real life is simply not possible.

The continuation of the movie brought scenes that were unfortunately cluttered with an all-too-predictable plot, which is repeated in so many mainstream Hollywood movies. That is, the 3D experience stopped at the visual element of the film. Instead of choosing a complex theme of blurring the line between what is good and bad, the people involved in making the movie decided to focus on a story between nature vs. the corporate world and its evil military muscle. It is again the linear thought of the creators of this film that forget that they benefit from the military might that they portray as evil. They enjoy the freedom of speech because they live under the umbrella of the most powerful nation and its military. They also enjoy the unlimited profits from capitalism that they represent in the film as the evil mining company who brings precious ore from the land of Pandora back home to its needy consumer base. I ask the producers to glance into a mirror and see that they are a part of what they depict as bad and wrong. They need to take some of the responsibility as well and stop depicting the military leaders as the happy arms of Satan. In contrast, a movie called Princess Mononoke put a human and caring face to the mining effort that was also destroying nature in its quest to expand. Perhaps the producer thought the mainstream American audience is too simple-minded to grasp a more involved plot?

By Hayao Miyazaki

Princess Mononoke by Hayao Miyazaki

For me, the most atrocious offense were the parents who brought small children to watch this film. How do we enlighten parents who decide to take kids to this show? As I was constantly negotiating with my emotions to keep everything in check under such powerful scenes and sounds, I could only wonder how still-developing minds of young children were being assaulted by trying to do the same, only to end up failing and crying. Certainly the corporate structure that the producers were attacking with the plot of this film are essentially guilty of the same gluttonous greed by not penalizing theaters for allowing children under 13 to view this movie. (The movie is rated PG-13, which I agree with).

Despite the overkill of missiles, battles and destruction, Avatar 3D brought awareness to the masses to realize that destroying the habitat, either alien or domestic, is a really bad thing. I only hope that the younger generation that is getting a full dose of this message from so many sources aren’t overly desensitized to forget that they should actually do something about it.

-Keitan

(Link to featurette: http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/fox/avatar/hd/)

Homeopathy comes under attack

No Comments
environment, political

Below is an email that I sent to a group called Voices of Young Science, who wish to discredit and essentially destroy the art of homeopathy. I strongly encourage others to send an email to those responsible for this misinformation. Also, here is the link to the BBC article:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8211925.stm

———————

Dear Sense About Science / Voices of Young Science,

After receiving a letter from a trusted source, I see that your organization is alarmed by the growth of homeopathy. From the articles I’ve read, your group sees this methodology as nothing more than placebo and should be extinguished.

I can understand that the tools by how things are currently measured can’t always detect the energetic principles that is the basis of how homeopathy works, but in the evolution of science, I find that many ‘laws’ are disproved when better tools of variable detection are available… rendering previous beliefs, theories and laws obsolete.

Your group is in danger of becoming discredited if it continues to pursue this path in attacking homeopathy as a pseudoscience. The undetectable variables that are not traceable with conventional tools do not conclusively mean that the energy of the remedies are ineffective.

If the goal of medicine is to create a more healthy patient, I challenge medicine to answer the larger question of the deleterious effects of pharmaceutical production which poisons our clean air and water. How does conventional medicine justify and rationalize the perpetual side effects of its remedies while destroying the habitat of the patients it is trying to help?

I do understand that homeopathic remedies resemble placebo to those who don’t wish to genuinely explore the methodology of the practice, but as a patient of classical homeopathy now for eight years, I can say that I am healthier and happier now in my forties than I can remember even back to my early twenties (even though I was quite skeptical at the onset of my homeopathic treatment). I haven’t needed (nor desired) to take a pharmaceutical remedy since I’ve started the homeopathic path and feel more free than the vast majority who are struggling to counteract all the side effects of traditional medicine. Homeopathy treats the psyche as well as the symptoms. I have benefited immensely in the treatment of my whole person.

If you are simply agents of the pharmaceutical industry, then you probably will simply delete this email as poppycock. But if you are truly scientists who search for objective knowledge in all things, then I implore you to try to research the science of homeopathy. It is a medicinal art as valid as the art of conventional medicine and worthy of further research in what it can contribute to the overall evolution of medicine.

Sincerely,

Keith Gonzalez
Coordinator of IT for Natural Sciences
College of Arts and Sciences IT
University of Oregon
Email: keithg@uoregon.edu

2012 – Coming soon to a universe near you

No Comments
environment, evolution, political

 

             The year 2012 and the month of December is approaching. It seems far off, but with the acceleration of time these days it’s going to be here before we realize. For those who still don’t know what 2012 is all about, here is a brief synopsis, and a link to the wiki article…

             Supposedly the ancient Mayans in charge of creating a extremely accurate calendar did a wonderful job, but they stopped at a point which translates to mid-December of 2012 in the Julian-Gregorian calendar that we all use in the West. The reason for the end of the calendar is that there was no point going beyond this date, according to the Mayans. Some have translated this to mean that the earth is going to end, time recycles back to its starting point, or that humanity (and everything else) is going to start into a brand new era of being. That’s where the speculation begins to get interesting. There are books galore that can tell you all about what the relevance of 2012 is, but should you believe any of these writings?

             Recently I visited the planetarium and spoke with the director of the facility. She is a professional astronomer in Eugene, Oregon. We had a chat about the stars, planets and such, and I asked her if the stars change position over the thousands of years of humans watching them. She informed me that besides a few small deviations, the stars are where they were from our perspective as long as humans have scurried on planet earth. I then asked her about any astronomical evidence that would support the Mayan calendar from a universal point of view. I thought that if we were approaching a starting point as referenced from our position in the galaxy or larger sphere, it might give some credence to what is being tossed around as a life-changing event for all of us. After considerable thought, reflecting and calculating, she could offer no correlation to an astronomical event. I thanked her for her time and knowledge.

             So, that is one scientific opinion that would scrap any notion that December 2012 is going to produce anything more than the puff of smoke that came with the Y2K bug that was supposed to bring civilization to its knees.

             But if I could offer a couple of examples that would point to a significant event, it would be these two:

  • Time is moving faster and faster. I can easily remember a time when I was bored and watched the clock, but those lazy days are far gone. Now I have trouble doing the relatively same tasks in a day, as I always run out of time. I could expand on this and say that if we were a grain of sand in an hourglass of time, we wouldn’t notice the passage of time if we were near the top of the heap. But once we get closer to the bottleneck, things start to really accelerate by our perspective and become more rapid as we get closer to that point. Now, I could blame all the technology that ’steals’ our time by giving us more and more information to assimilate, but that wouldn’t be as interesting…
  • We are becoming more aware. OK, not all of us. Watching ‘Family Guy’ or reality programming doesn’t seem to do much for the evolution of the mind, but I have noticed that people are becoming more aware of what is going on around them. The fact that we now have a president that is full of promise to make our lives better and more in balance with the earth is also proof that the majority of people are ready to move into a new era of being on this planet. Time tells if we can actually make it in time before things get too bad too quickly. 

             In conclusion, 2012 can be a major event where everything is different. Maybe we all get to read each others’ thoughts, or maybe Jupiter collapses into a star and we have perpetual daylight. Ya, a lot could happen that would get us all driving solar-hybrid-garbage processing Toyotas, but I am just going to live well, love lots, and wait and see.

             Links: Wikipedia (scroll down to “2012 geophysical and cosmological speculations”) or Nay-sayer or the Mayan-Hindu connection. Take your pick!

             Please see that survey poll on the left side of this website to have your say.

          -Keitan

Defibrillation for a broken economy

2 Comments
environment, political

 

            While the national and world leaders try to tell us that they are going to stimulate the economy with whatever method they have at their hands, it’s hard for me to believe that any one or group of humans can do anything to change the natural course of this beaten and battered financial system. It doesn’t matter if it is the economy, the crime levels or the amount of babies being born. Everything that lives inhales and exhales until its final transition to cessation. That goes for amoebas all the way up to these whopping social systems created and maintained by us. As far as our leaders are concerned, even though I voted for Barack Obama, I have little faith in the fact that he can use conventional people in high status positions to show us the way to prosperity. These people gained their status and power from playing the rules of the game that no longer apply. How can the group of them dig us out of this hole? No, the only thing that they can do is keep bleeding our tax money into their pockets and the pockets of the larger corporations. They are putting band-aids on a hemorrhaging patient. And when an amputation is called for to save the patient, do they dare cut off their own legs to save the rest of us? Likely not.

             Now, what good would my rant be without a suggestion? I do believe them when they say that this is the biggest threat to our lifestyles since The Great Depression. One thing that I noticed between now and then is this: Back then the industrial revolution was just cranking up. Factories were being built to produce stuff in ways that could reach the households of every middle class family. Commonly gotten electricity and phones were only a couple of decades old, and cars were just starting to be produced to have one parked in every driveway. It was a massive shift in the way humans lived. It was the beginning of stuff and luxurious living for the common person. Then someone said “BOO!” and the stock market crashed. Yes, they improved the reliability of that system as it stumbled many times with boom and crashes until today. Don’t forget that the world back then was enthralled in a geopolitical chess game of regional and world wars.

             Today, we are going through something very similar with the advent of the Information-Communication age. Few of us can imagine what the world would be like without computers, let alone the ‘miracle’ of Google. The effectiveness of my skills at my job wouldn’t be the same without the Internet. So, yes, we are shifting again in consciousness and how we live. And yes, we are all going to suffer (some much greater than others) while our leaders try to figure out what the heck is going on. Oh, and by the way, the world is in the throes of geopolitically fueled regional wars over resources. Hmm, haven’t we been here before?

             The good news and the bad news: In a few years we are going to enter a new era of interacting and living with each other. Words like ‘nano’ and ‘google’ are going to replace ‘plastic’ and ‘yellow pages.’ But what I am worried about the most is the implementation of all these new technologies. We’ve never been so close to the edge of bringing forth such beautiful new systems to improve the lifestyle of so many, yet be so close to the edge of darkness from these same inventions. Moral responsibility is so needed as we go through this transition. I keep my fingers crossed.

             My suggestion to any world leaders out there: Economy is about living things in action. It doesn’t matter if it is rebuilding from the destruction of war, or rebuilding from the destruction of our actions of the Industrial Age. The economy is good as long as people have work with a purpose. I can think of nothing more important than repairing the habitat damage so we can continue to grow. That means also feeding and teaching third world countries how to do things right, but not until we are on that path ourselves. Information is the new money, and systems have to be implemented that create a new relationship between people’s information and manufacturing. A currency that is directly tied to the health of the planet is also the critical step to real change. Yes, I can go into fine detail, but is anyone listening? I hope the world leaders get a hint of writings like this and others that are calling for real change. That is what I voted for, after all. I say, let the economy die. From the ashes of its cremation can rise the Phoenix to bring a new light and breath for a better and more sustainable future.

-keitan

PS, Happy Solstice! Welcome the longer days with thoughts of hope.

Introducing: abundance and wealth

No Comments
environment

“Can the earth sustain its inhabitants and give a good lifestyle for all who are here?”

     To effect change on this planet, we are now at the crossroads to start thinking about what needs to change to move forward together. Keep in mind that consumerism is only slightly more than 100 years old. Before then, we lived more in harmony with the earth. This specifically means that if we never capitalized on the industrial age, we wouldn’t have the amount of unnatural toxic pollution that we are currently suffering from.

     When I was growing up in south Florida, I immensely enjoyed riding my bike to the beach and jumping into the clean waters of the warm Atlantic Ocean. This was back in the 70s and 80s, and the biggest worry about swimming in the ocean was being stung by man-o-war or the occasional wild barracuda which might snap at me. But pollution was hardly an issue. I would open my eyes underwater and take in the miracle of the cleansing salt sea. I would spend hours floating in the water, or surfing when the waves were up.

     But now when I travel back to Florida and visit the same places where I grew up, I am sad to see the amount of garbage washing ashore. When I look to the horizon, I see brown haze instead of sea mist. My mind turns to my son, and I sigh thinking about how much harder it is to find pristine places in the world nowadays.

     My nostalgia does not come without a sense of practicality. I love the amenities that allow me the comforting luxuries of my modern lifestyle. A hundred years ago, hot water for a shower wasn’t so easy to come by, and the computer that I type on wasn’t even in the cloud of thought. But I have a dream in mind, where I believe that we are advanced enough in our ingenuity to be able to produce “creature comforts” in ways that are much more in balance with the environment.

     I realize that I must take responsibility for the actions of my purchasing. I understand that I appreciate being able to afford gadgets and other goods and services for a great price. But with the click of my mouse when I do my online checkout, somewhere in China, a factory is spewing out unfiltered toxins into the air and water to meet my consumer demands. How do we possibly change the results of what we like so it doesn’t pollute the precious habitat for us and every other being on this earth?!

     More than ten years ago, I was introduced to the only way this can effectively be achieved. It is a very simple concept, but has global implications. Currently, our wealth and abundance is based on the limited goods on the earth. A basic example is gold. Gold is precious because it isn’t necessarily plentiful. If copper were more rare, you bet it would be more valuable. Gold is useful, as well as oil. And when we base the wealth of a nation on limited commodities like this, we set ourselves up for eventual disaster. Wars are fought over these kinds of limited resources. But this isn’t the kind of wealth that can sustain all beings, especially when there are more and more people, and think of the stresses on the planet and national boundaries when the Chinese people are told by their government that they can also have a luxurious life like the Americans if they are willing to work hard for it. That is simply a recipe for global destruction.

     I’m not suggesting that we take away the value of precious goods. No, instead, I suggest something much more robust to accommodate the population of the planet, while at the same time providing a basis of sustainability of the habitat so people can continue to pursue their dreams without fear of global conflict over limited resources. I would like to introduce: earth product abundance.

     The real wealth for everyone is based in how well the earth can produce a livable environment for its inhabitants. It has been proven by the current economic crisis that all countries are tied together financially, even if we have different currencies and GDPs. If every country ties the value of their currency to the health of the earth’s ecosystem, then we can functionally change the motivation from ravaging the earth’s natural resources. If we value the earth enough to have its health tied to our money, we can continue with our innovations to better lifestyles. If a company is told that it can make more money planting a forest versus cutting it down, you better believe the business model of that company is going to change.

     In a simplified sentence: The earth has the true abundance and wealth for all beings. 

     There is much more to this concept in its execution, but the world leaders must understand the importance of preserving the habitat. We only get one earth. She’s perfect in her form and function. Our collective voice can help guide our leaders to this win-win formula. Let’s restore our human vocation of being the caretakers of the garden, and when we do this, imagination is the only limitation to what we can grow.

     If you would like to hear more about this topic, sign in to leave a comment or let me know via email:

-Keitan (moonphase9@yahoo.com)